If robot vacuum cleaners fascinate you, you have landed just at the right page. Getting a robot vacuum cleaner means making your life easy. With it by your side, you don’t have to worry about the cleaning of your house and making it neat. It is the reason why people love to splurge on robot vacuum cleaners no matter whether they fall on higher price range.
When we talk about robot vacuum cleaners, iRobot from Roomba takes all the attention. Roomba has launched different versions and models of their robot vacuum cleaners. Being technically advanced and endowing all the desired features, iRobots are worth a purchase.
If getting a high-quality robot vacuum cleaner is in your list now, the content below will help manifolds. Here we have come up with a comparison of iRobot Roomba 877 vs iRobot Roomba 890. You will get detailed information about both and can make a buying decision.
iRobot Roomba 877 Robotic Vacuum Cleaner
iRobot Roomba 890 Robot Vacuum Cleaner with Wi-Fi Connectivity
The 800 series of Roomba is worthwhile because of the following reasons:
iAdapt Navigation- It is highly essential for a robot vacuum cleaner to have an excellent navigation system. Both Roomba 877 and 890 comprise two sensors which easily find out their way overcoming all the obstacles coming in the path. Mapping the entire room and understanding which parts of the room require intense cleaning makes them highly appealing. Both make sure to make a smooth transition in tiles, hard floors, and carpets and pick up all types of dust and debris thereby become perfect for all surfaces. The suction power of both Roomba 877 and 890 is very high that automatically adjusts according to the surface.
AeroForce High-efficiency filters- High-grade filters are highly essential to make the environment and air clean and hygienic. The presence of high-efficiency AeroFilters allow big as well as minute particles to suck up efficiently without getting a release back. The best thing about these filters is they are company’s own due to which they become highly effective and useful. They are reported to suck up 99% of particles of size as less as 10 microns.
Scheduling- This is one of the most exciting features of any robot vacuum cleaner. You can schedule the vacuuming sessions in iRobot Roomba 877 and iRobot Roomba 890 and let them do the needful whenever required. All that is required is to program the cleaning sessions of your home in your device and let it do the work. The presence of configurable cleaning schedules up to seven times per week makes them impressive.
3-stage cleaning- Both iRobot Roomba 877 and iRobot Roomba 890 utilizes 3-stage cleaning that makes the floor as well as carpets neat and spotless. In the first stage, the counter-rotating tangle free brushes pick the debris of different size. Next, works on removing the particles from the wall like spider webs and other hanging filths. The third and the last stage involves sucking up every dirt and dust from the brushes and depositing them in the dustbin.
Now let us take a glance over the features which differentiate iRobot Roomba 877 and iRobot Roomba 890.
iRobot Roomba 877- This device comes with a virtual lighthouse which is efficient for fulfilling two purposes. The first one is working as a virtual wall, and another is as a beacon for cleaning. You may put it either on the virtual wall mode or lighthouse mode. While the former one act as a barrier in preventing the device from passing the invisible line, the later one will make sure that each room is spotless before moving to another.
iRobot Roomba 890- This device comes with a Dual Mode Virtual Barrier with the help of which you can set it on a virtual wall mode. Once established, it will confine the areas which are sensitive or comprises immovable products and doesn’t require vacuuming. Place where you have kept the food trays or pet’s water bowl are also included in these areas.
Bottom Line: Seeing the features of both, it seems iRobot Roomba 890 is more effective than iRobot Roomba 877. The reason behind is the extraordinary Dual-Mode Virtual Barrier which makes sure that none of your valuable products will damage. Moreover, with the virtual mode, you can restrict specific areas in the room.
Roomba 890 Check Latest Price
Roomba 877 Check Latest Price
2. Remote Control ability
iRobot Roomba 877- You need to have a remote control for operating this device. Although operating so far is easy and accurate and the vacuum cleaner can perform tedious work with no hassles, you need to buy a remote control to access.
iRobot Roomba 890- This device is highly feasible when it comes to remote controllability. It can connect to the Wi-Fi network of the house. All that you need is to download the app, configure your device and the vacuuming schedules and command it where and when to clean right from your smartphone. The best part is it is compatible with Amazon Alexa as well.
Bottom Line: Clearly, due to greater compatibility and attuning to virtual assistants like Alexa, iRobot Roomba 890 scores more points here. Moreover, who wants to buy a separate remote control like in iRobot Roomba 877 when you can work right from your tablet or smartphone?
Both iRobot Roomba 877 and iRobot Roomba 890 comes with recharge and resume feature. It means once out of battery or completing their task; they will automatically return to their charging dock and get recharged. While the runtime of iRobot Roomba 877 is 60 minutes, it is 90 minutes for iRobot Roomba 890.
Bottom Line: With the difference of 30 minutes, iRobot Roomba 890 scores more here. Although 60 minutes are enough to make an extremely dirty room spotless, 90 minutes runtime will make sure that not even a single spot will be left.
Considering all the features, it is evident that iRobot Roomba 890 is a better and modified version in the 800 series of Roomba vacuum cleaners. From the virtual assistant capability to more runtime, better cleaning ability to great vision, iRobot Roomba 890 is definitely a must-have robot vacuum cleaner in the 800 series of Roomba.
Upright vacuum cleaners are quite of a trendy home improvement tool now, and Shark had been one big brand in the game. Apart from its famous series of Shark Lines, there are some recently released models containing improved cleaning ability along with professional touch.
And Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional with Dust-Away & 2 Microfiber Pads (NV356E) and Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional Vacuum (NV370) are two of them.
The models are closely similar to each other from many aspects such as design, functionalities, and outlook. We will break down the comparison data from each of these perspectives and help you to choose one between them.
But for now, let's start with a thorough comparison between Shark NV356e vs NV370.
Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional NV356E
Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional Vacuum (NV370)
Some Background Information
The shark is a home improvement tool manufacturer and both of our cleaners are from the house of this brand. Shark was founded back in 1998 and since then, they've expanded their business through Massachusetts, Needham and all over the USA.
Now, let’s talk about upright vacuums and what they serve you with.
Upright vacuum cleaners are lightweight, portable and easy-to-use vacuum cleaners and you can use it everywhere at the home. Any kind of spot cleaning, dust and debris removal, surface cleaning, stairs, and carpet cleaning- etc. are done well with upright vacuum cleaners.
Let’s talk about Shark NV356e vs NV370- two of the most familiar models from Shark, and go through the similarities and dissimilarities of them-
Both of these cleaners are made of light-weight and durable materials such as PP and ABS plastic. Apart from the plastic the body, you will find some parts made of metal and rubber in both of the models.
Such solid structure should last for at least a few years. And what about the color choices? Well, both of them are available in white and silver.
Both Shark NV356e vs NV370 are of the almost same dimension. The dimension of them is 45"tall, 15" wide and 11.4 inches deep. Apart from this, the next biggest similarity is it's lifted away button. Lift away button helps to list the canister away so that you can easily clean spaces which are hard to reach with the hands.
In both of these models, the cleaning technology is almost the same. Shark has it's own patented technology that they've implied in both of these vacuum cleaners. The specialty of this cleaning technology is, it can imply the same amount of suction power at multiple areas at the same time.
To give it an extra hand of pure, healthy cleaning, Shark has implemented anti-allergen seal technology and HEPA filtration system. If you're a sufferer from dust allergy, this might be great for you.
Like every other upright vacuum, you need to take proper care of both of these models we're talking about. As you can see, both of them has HEPA filters. That's responsible for filtering out micro-sized particles.
Also, there is a physical filter to capture the large-sized dirt and debris. Both of these filters need an equal amount of maintenance on regular basis. The physical filter (along with the felt filter) should be cleaned once every three months. On the other hand, the HEPA filter should be cleaned once after every 2 years of use.
One of the finest additional features in NV370 is its swivel steering. To have excellent control when you're moving around furniture or obstacle, this swivel steering will come to be ultra-helpful.
First of all, this is one significant difference between Shark NV356e vs NV370 and it's the length of the hose. NV356e comes with a hose pipe which is only 5 feet long. Such length is not sufficient when you're working in a central hall room or living room.
However, the NV370 has got some improvement here. It has a hose length of 8.5 feet, and we welcome this upgrade in this model. To clean corners and edges, this will come to be super helpful.
If you talk about a vacuum cleaner, it’s dust cup will definitely be a concern. This is the part which holds debris and the bigger the dust cup, the better your work is.
In the case of NV356e, the dust cup seems to be a little bigger than NV370. So, you will have more comfort to work, and your working time will be decreased as well.
However, it’s still not that much of a concern. As long as you have a large enough canister, the size of the dust cup won’t give you visible differences.
With an upright vacuum cleaner, you can expect to get a handful of accessories. And that also works for these two models as well.
NV356e comes with fewer accessories than NV370. With NV356e, you will get these few items-
On the other hand, with the NV370, the list of accessories is following-
In terms of price, NV370 comes to be cheaper compared to NV356e. Although both of these models lie under a price range of 200 dollars, if you're looking forward to lower price range, we would recommend you to go for NV370.
PP and ABS plastic
PP and ABS plastic
Length of The Hose
Thanks for being with the post till the dead end. Hope we've been able to demonstrate all the differences between Shark NV356e vs NV370 upright vacuum cleaner, and helped you to choose one among these two.
Robotics is one of those branches of studies which are not leaving any stone unturned to make people’s life easier. Entering the world of vacuum cleaners and creating something like iRobot vacuum cleaners, robotics are worth the applause.
Since the time Roomba has launched its iRobot, it has brought a storm in vacuum cleaner industry. Although they fall slightly under higher price range, the way they make cleaning hassle-free is worth every penny.
Some of The Significant Advantages of iRobots From Roomba Are?
If these pros allure you too, it’s time to ponder upon two best iRobots from Roomba viz., Roomba 614 and Roomba 690 and compare them to see which one is better than the other.
iRobot Roomba 614 Robot Vacuum Cleaner
iRobot Roomba 690 Robot Vacuum
When we talk about convenience, we try to find out how user-friendly the device is. Moreover, we also look for the potential features that can make cleaning hassle-free.
iRobot Roomba 614 comes with two brush rolls that work in such a way that both minute particles, as well as large debris, get a complete eradication. There are side brushes to whisk the dirt while moving.
From the powerful suction boost system to simple touch and control function, all contributes to making it one of the best. It consists of a lithium-ion battery that makes sure device will work for longer durations per charge.
If we talk about the suction power, it subdues Roomba 614 due to the presence of an auto-adjust floor plate. Also, there is a barrier device that prevents the robot entering off-limit areas. One may easily customize a weekly vacuuming schedule in it and sit back and relax forgetting cleaning completely because your robot will do the needful.
Bottom Line: Observing the superficial features we can simply declare Roomba 690 to be a better version of Roomba 614 when it comes to bringing ease in cleaning. The most enthralling feature is compatibility with virtual assistants that make it superior to its counterpart.
Both Roomba 614 and Roomba 690 feature three-point cleaning system. However, there are certain points which differentiate the two.
Roomba 614: It can efficiently work on the uneven surfaces and pick up minute debris including pet fur. Comprising elevation sensors, it makes its way properly by raising and lowering the floor plate so that suction does not loose. The patented Dirt Detect sensors do their work and ensure complete riddance of dirt and dust.
As discussed earlier, the pair of brush rolls does a fantastic job by removing the stubborn debris with ease. Propeller brush on the sides with 27-degree movement lifts the dirt instead of spreading it more.
Roomba 690: This iRobot is one of the most versatile when it comes to cleaning differently textured surfaces viz., hard floors, carpets or mixture of flooring. It can also adjust to the elevations with the help of floor plate to prevent losing the suction. With its Dirt Detection Technology, it makes things easy for itself.
There are two brushes that move and clean both heavy as well as minute debris with ease. Along with these, there are side brushes as well that scrub off the stubborn filths in lesser time and fewer efforts.
Bottom Line: Roomba 614 and Roomba 690 carry almost similar cleaning accessories and operations. Therefore, with both the machines you will get an alike and thorough cleaning. So, in this category both give a neck to neck fight to each other and none of them is better than the other.
Roomba 614- The moving pattern of Roomba 614 is random. However, it covers every inch of the floor which is open. There is a spot mode which detects a particular stain and cleans it by continuous to and fro movements.
There are sensors to neglect the obstacles coming the way and take calculated steps. It can easily move under furniture to get the dirt out. The presence of wheels in this 7.5 pounds iRobot makes its navigation easy.
Roomba 690- It makes random crisscross patterns while moving and consists of spot detecting mode. Moreover, weekly scheduling and perimeter mode along with compatibility with virtual assistants are its plus points.
There is iRobot iAdapt Navigation which is the USP of the device. There are sturdy wheels in this 3.6 X 13 inches sized iRobot which makes every corner of the home accessible.
Bottom Line: Roomba 690 with its iNavigation becomes the best out of two. It makes sure that the likelihood of collisions or falls seizes to zero. Also, due to greater compatibility, Roomba 690 is easy to control.
Roomba 614- It is a self-charging automated device that self-docks whenever runs out of battery. There is a lithium-ion battery that has 60 to 90 minutes of average run time.
Roomba 690- You may either push this device and send to the charging, or it will go by its own. The cleaning cycle is around 60 to 90 minutes due to the powerful lithium-ion battery.
Bottom Line: With almost similar battery life, dirt collection capability, self-charging skill, and lengthy working cycle, both these iRobots from Roomba impress people. In this category, both of them scores equally.
Roomba has brought some of the best cleaning machines in the market. Both these devices are the live example of the same. The only major feature that makes Roomba 690 superior over Roomba 614 is its greater compatibility with virtual assistants like iRobot HOME App, Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant.
Other than this, both of them endow excellent cleaning performance, navigation skills, and user-friendly interface. However, since both of them are pricey, it is essential you make the best choice as per your requirements and budget.
Devices that can take your workload are bliss. Vacuum cleaners hold the foremost place in this category and therefore are the first choice of all. However, at the same time having the best device becomes necessary to get the best outcome.
Dyson has brought different models in the market which are worth every penny. Today we will compare the two most potent Dyson vacuum cleaners viz., Dyson DC35 and Dyson V6 and find out which one is worthiest. So let us bring the limelight into each feature and discuss the potential pros and cons.
Generally, people seek for design which is ergonomic, user-friendly and easy to handle. Fortunately, both Dyson DC35 and Dyson V6 fulfill the requirements as they consist of upright design. The major pros of the design are:
The only difference between the two is their height and color. While Dyson DC35 is silver-blue and 44.1 inches in height, Dyson V6 is white with the height of 46.4 inches.
The lesser is the weight, the better is the portability. Isn’t it? Here Dyson V6 scores more points with the weight of just 4.5 pounds. While on the other hand, Dyson DC35 weighs little more measuring to be around 4.8 pounds. Both of them have a slim design which eases not only handling but maneuverability as well.
Some of its benefits are:
Both of them are perfect for people having back pain; however, Dyson V6 is slightly better than its counterpart.
A vacuum cleaner is worthless if its cleaning capabilities don’t meet the requirements. If we talk about how well they clean, we have to ponder upon their features. Some of the features that are common in both Dyson DC35 and Dyson V6 are:
Root Cyclone Technology- Both the devices are equipped with Root Cyclone Technology which is patented technology By Dyson. Using the centrifugal force to remove the stubborn dirt and pushing them directly to the dustbin is what makes the devices alluring.
Li-ion battery- This is one of the most powerful batteries which constantly endow the desired power to the devices to perform the task with high precision. The plus point is it requires less maintenance than other batteries.
Attachments- Both of them comes with a variety of attachments that enhance the usability and cleaning performance. They not only make the vacuum cleaners versatile but also perfect to clean different places with utmost perfection.
Convenience- Both of them are readily convertible into handheld devices by detaching the wand to clean tight corners, cars, below the furniture, carpet, curtains and every other thing.
Now let us find out the features that make Dyson DC35 and Dyson V6 different from each other.
Brush- Dyson DC35 comprises motorized brush. It easily picks up the minute dust particles from hard floors and carpets. On the other hand, Dyson V6 consists of direct-drive head spin and push brush bristles that can take out most stubborn and deeply embedded dirt with no hassles.
Dyson V6 scores more point here with the ability to easily remove the hard to eradicate dirt and dust from all kinds of surfaces.
Charging time- The lesser is the charging time, the better is the device. In this aspect, Dyson DC35 takes 3 and half hours to get fully charged. While on the other hand, Dyson V6 takes 15 minutes less and grabs the better position.
If you want a device that gets charged fast Dyson V6 could become a better choice.
HEPA filters- HEPA filters are considered the most crucial part of any vacuum cleaner. Being the best filters, they make the device worthy enough to make a purchase. If we compare the two models of Dyson under question, Dyson DC35 lacks HEPA filters although they consist of the filtration system that lasts for a lifetime.
However, its counterpart that is Dyson V6 is equipped with HEPA filters which are certified as asthma and allergy friendly system. It can easily imprison 99.97% of minute dirt and dust particles making the ambiance hygienically clean.
Clearly, Dyson V6 with HEPA filters is more potent than Dyson DC35 which comprises some other filtration system.
Accessories- Accessories are something that enhances the worthiness of any product. The more and useful accessories one gets with a device, the more is its usability. Dyson DC35 comes with four major accessories viz., crevice tool, extension wand, combination, and motorized floor tool. The floor vac attachments with a spinning brush are ideal for cleaning both the carpets and hard floors.
Dyson V6, on the other hand, comprises far more accessories and attachments like a fluffy tool, direct drive cleaner head, mini motorized tool, mini soft dusting brush, combination, and crevice tool. All of them make it perfect to clean different surfaces with ease.
If we compare both the devices, we can clearly see that Dyson V6 is slightly a better version of Dyson DC35. Although the sleek and elegant design, excellent suction power and easy portability of Dyson DC35 make it commendable, lack of HEPA filters and short run time place it at the second position.
Dyson V6 price see details
Dyson dc35 price see details
While on the other hand, Dyson V6 with additional soft roller cleaner heads to avoid scratches on the floor, the ability to pick large as well as small debris in one go makes it worth a purchase. Moreover, the presence of HEPA filters brings grandeur to the device.
So, all that you need is to consider your requirements beforehand and make the right choice. After all, it is about your home and your convenience.
Roomba 800 series from iRobot has introduced some of the best robotic vacuum cleaners at people’s reach. Among numerous models, Roomba 880 and 805 still remains most preferred and convenient cleaners up to this date. Despite being an older model, the satisfactory performance of Roomba 805 keeps it competitive with other advanced models.
And Roomba 880 is indeed the best robot cleaner from 800 series that initiated the further advancement of robotic vacuums.
When your choice gets down to these two, it becomes a challenging task to choose the right one. As they share several similarities from inside and outside, you need a distinctive comparison between these models. With our Roomba 880 vs 805 article, we will give you a detailed comparison of these two which will certainly help you with your decision.
iRobot Roomba 880 Robot Vacuum
iRobot Roomba 805 Cleaning Vacuum
Both Roomba 805 and Roomba 880 belongs to the Roomba 800 series and therefore, shares considerable similarities between them. Though Roomba 805 is an early product from 800 series, it still remains one of the most preferred robotic vacuum till date. Meanwhile, Roomba 880 is the late generation from 800 series and there are some inclusions of advanced features.
As both have great acceptance among the customers, you should know the difference between these two while buying. And with our Roomba 880 vs 805 reviews, you will get a good distinctive comparison between them to make your purchase.
Roomba 880 comes with a perfect circular shape, whereas 805 has a slight oval appearance. Though both of them share the same black exterior, the 880 offers a great attraction regarding the design. Apart from that, there are some additional buttons over the surface for 880 than its counterpart in this case.
The arrangement of the buttons is another thing that may catch the attention. The 880 has a better lining of silver color that looks more appealing than Roomba 805. But overall, both vacuum cleaners have a decent appearance and attractive exterior to suit its job.
Although both the models share different sizes, they do share the same weight of 8.4 pounds. Needless to say, the older mechanism contributes to the slight increase in weight of Roomba 805. Despite being a masterpiece from 800 series, Roomba 880 on the other hand, offers less weight regarding its features and additional parts. And with a weight of 8.4 pounds, both of the robots have good portability for sure.
With some advanced features and extra parts, the 880 requires further power consumption than the latter. Not to mention, the suction power represents a good indication of power requirement. Whereas Roomba 880 provides suction of 1000 Pa, the other falls short of 400 Pa when it comes to suction.
Moreover, the running time for 880 is more than the 805, thanks to X Life High Power battery installation. Though Roomba 805 comes with less powerful lithium-ion battery, it is sufficient enough to make the cleaning for a reasonable space.
Both models are programmed to carry the cleanups according to the specified schedule. In fact, the 805 can hold the scheduling for the entire 7 days of the week. Again, one of the most important differences between these two is the remote control feature, not to mention, the advanced 880 holds the facility of remote control which remains absent in model 805.
In addition, there are dust cups to hold the dirt though they are quite small in size compared with hand driven vacuum cleaners. Being members of 800 series, both share similar dust management features and dust holding capacity. In fact, you can get a holding capacity of 0.65 liters with any of the aforementioned models.
Performance is the most important thing that matters for a robotic vacuum. And regarding the cleanup efficiency, both are still among the best choices of robotic vacuums in the market.
Featuring patented AeroForce cleaning system, both Roomba models offer convenient cleaning using the combination of suction, brushing and agitation. With better suction power and side brushes on both side, Roomba 880 is quite ahead of model 805 in cleanup performance.
With iAdapt Navigation technique, both cleaners easily map out the rooms and therefore, prevents collision with objects. In precise and accurate directional movement helps to increase the cleaning efficiency in heavily dirt spots to a great extent.
Containing a high-efficiency filtration system, the 805 can capture about 99% of allergens, pores, and particles up to 10 microns. But with the 880, there comes a HEPA filter that induces another important difference with its counterpart. The advanced HEPA filtration system can deliver a 99.7% cleaning efficiency for allergens and other debris. And the tangle-free counter rotating extractors grabs larger particles to break them down to smaller ones.
Though both models produce suctioning noise to some extent, they never get to the annoying level. And both are programmed to return its base for docking after cleaning and recharging when they get low on battery. Being random cleaners, the models don’t have any particular pattern to follow, yet they provide excellent cleaning performance for both carpets and hardwood floors without missing any major dirt spots. Again, you can achieve a satisfactory dust removal with multi-room cleanups at once.
Aero-Force 3-Stage Cleaning
Entire Level Cleaning
X Life High Power
Automatic Docking & Recharge
From our Roomba 880 vs 805 discussions, it is clear that they share more similarities than differences to make the decision difficult. Being available at a lower price, you can settle with Roomba 805 if you don’t want the additional features of Roomba 880. And you can have the best of 800 series with Roomba 880 which will cost you some more money. Whatever the choice will be, you will receive the best robotic cleaning service for the house without a doubt.
Handheld vacuums are the most convenient form of cleaning machines that induce a more efficient, versatile and user-friendly cleaning. In case of having the best handheld cleaner, smart customers prefer a multi-functioning model that is rich in accessories and features. Eureka introduces several handheld machines among which 41A and 71B still remain the best-selling and most reliable vacuum for household cleaning. Though they are from different series, both of them share several similarities with a couple of differences.
Not to mention, it becomes quite difficult to choose the right one when your options get down to this two convenient product. Therefore, we got here Eureka 41A vs 71B comparison to make the decision easy for you. We focused on every important feature and their details which will certainly represent a clearer distinctive picture for you.
Eureka RapidClean Step Handheld Corded Vacuum, 41A
Eureka EasyClean Lightweight Handheld Vacuum Cleaner, Hand Vac Corded, 71B
Sharing several striking similarities, both 41A and 71B come with a noticeable difference in front side and color in the first place. Though Eureka 41A comes from RapidClean series whereas the Eureka 71B comes from EasyClean series, they have considerable resemblance making the choice more difficult.
Both the cleaners being bagless and corded, these portable and user-friendly products are manufactured for specific applications. In fact, Eureka 41A holds pretty well for cleaning the stairs or angled spaces. Meanwhile, Eureka 71B is more suitable for the plane and flat spaces.
The most obvious difference keeping the 41A and 71B side-by-side, are the exterior color and of course, the front cleaning head. But the remaining frame, stretching hose and dirt container are just the same for both the models. In fact, both models have a combination of yellow and black. Not to mention, the RapidClean 41A comes with a more blackish exterior whereas the EasyClean 71B offers a more yellowish frame. Apart from that, there comes a bare floor brush with the 41A at the exterior side which makes the front side different from the 71B.
Although the overall dimensions of both models show a considerable similarity, they barely affect the weight. Being a bit compacted cleaner, the 71B comes with a weight of 4.8 pounds which grows about 1.2 pounds to reach 6 pounds when it comes to 41A. Extra attachments for 41A contribute to the weight reducing the portability comparing with 71B. But two extra wheels at the front of 41A induce incredible portability and ease of handling allowing you to clean the angled spaces of the house.
Requiring a running power consumption of 6 Amps, the RapidClean 41A offers superb cleaning performance. But the EasyClean 71B comes with sufficient suctioning power, though it requires slightly less power consumption of 5.5 Amps. Again, the length of the included power cord is 25’ for 41A allowing the user to reach further spaces from the plugin. Meanwhile, the power cord length for 71B is 20’. Apart from that, the power hose is 3’ for both the models which are sufficient enough to clean the spaces.
There comes crevice tool attachment for both Eureka models to wipe out the dirt from different tight and narrow spaces. The skinny shape, as well as the angled tip of the tool, reaches tight spots to take care of the dust at once.
Apart from that, there comes a specific attachment for 41A naming bare-floor brushing tool. This is quite a narrow but wide enough tool with stiff and short bristles for improved cleaning efficiency. Not to mention, the bristles work well enough to wipe out stubborn and fine dust particles. It also enables the cleaner to take care of grit from tile or hardwood.
Both models contain motorized brush roll or motorized brushing head to carry out the primary cleaning task. This particular attachment comes with a rotating brush to wipe out dirt from carpets. Allowing the brush roll to spot thanks to the on/off brush roll switch, the user can also use it on bare floors with ease.
Regarding the cleaning performance, the 41A offers better efficiency in cleaning different angled structure like stairs. It also works for plane floors allowing the user to take care of the entire house with a satisfactory performance. In the meantime, the 71B may not hold that much good in cleaning stairs but it certainly delivers better performance in cleaning floors.
Both models have a washable filter for the collected dirt, but 41A lacks having a dust cup in comparison to the 71B. Again, there is a 6” wide cleaning path for both Eureka vacuum cleaners. With a more powerful suction than its counterpart, the 41A along with 6” cleaning path induces a higher cleaning efficiency for sure.
Being a compacted version, the 71B lacks some features, yet it offers riser visor which remains absent in model 41A. This riser visor is one handheld attachment of 71B that allows the brush roll to reach deep down of the carpet and also, upholstery to remove pet hair and other debris.
On/Off Brushroll Switch
1. Bare Floor Brush
2. Stretch Hose
3. Crevice Tool
1. Motorized Brush roll
2. Crevice Tool
3. Stretch Hose
After reviewing, there is no clear winner among these two versatile products. In fact, each of these two models is the best option you can have in its own field. With our detailed review of Eureka 41A vs 71B, you can easily understand their suitability and performance.
If you want something for angled places like stairs that is rich in features in a comparatively lower price, you can rely on Eureka 41A. But if you can manage to settle down with less featured but more efficient cleaner at an affordable price, you can have 71B for your house.
Manual vacuuming needs to be performed quickly and Shark is a provider of many outstanding upright cleaners for your arsenal. Among numerous cleaners of Shark, NV500 and NV501 still remain on top choices. Thanks to their flexible, user-friendly design that you can easily afford. When your choice gets down to these two, you will certainly face a challenge to pick the most suitable one.
As both models are from the same series, they have lots in common in terms of features and functions. Therefore, you need to get good detail of the models that will provide their distinctive picture. And with our Shark NV500 vs NV501 article, you will just get that. Breaking down the important features, it will help you to reach a suitable decision regarding the choice for sure.
Having red appearance along with similar exterior shape, both cleaners share a good resemblance at the first place. Though the size of the models comes with a bit different. The former NV500 comes with a smaller size whereas the latter NV501 has slightly larger dimensions.
In fact, the lifting handle for the NV501 is longer than its competitor. With a longer handle, it allows comfortable handling and passing of the cleaning machine. It has no major influence in performance, but the latter is quite easy to handle.
Despite having a smaller size, the NV500 has a weight of 21.1 lbs which falls to 15.5 lbs for NV501. Not to mention, the 3-in-1 system combination for NV500 contributes to the higher weight. The 3-in-1 system has additional parts in the system increasing the weight. Thus, the NV501 is more convenient in terms of portability. Therefore, the latter one is easy to carry and handle than the former model. But it may not seem very difficult with the NV501 as well.
All the models of Shark Rotator series have a power requirement of 1200W and these two are not any different either. It is true that power consumption is quite high for the models but both of them offer powerful vacuuming suction with the cord.
Apart from that, both machines include a reasonably long hose that makes the operation easy and helps to reach narrow corners. In total, there comes a 30’ long power cord to support the machine from the power source. With longer cord, both the models allow the user to cover quite a large space at once.
With an XL-capacity dust collecting bin, both models offer reasonable cleaning session each time with the cleaned bin. There is 1.3-quart capacity for dry cleaning whereas it provides 3.1-quart capacity for overall cleaning. Again, both models come with HEPA filtration system and anti-allergen technology to wipe out the maximum portion of dust. They can catch up to 99.9% of allergens through proper filtering ensuring a healthy cleaning for the ceilings and floors.
The 3-in-1 model NV500 comes with 3 major cleaning facilities naming lift-away pod, canister and upright position. The best part is you can trigger any of the aforementioned ones without the slightest trouble. Meanwhile, the 2-in-1 system for NV501 offers multilevel dust filtration facility along with convenient storage for the dust.
Featuring swivel steering technique, both the models offer great cleaning efficiency around the corners and confined spaces. The indicating headlights also help to simulate and control the operation with optimum effectiveness. Through ‘Never Loses Suction’ technology, you will get a consistent powerful suction for both models.
With the provided standard power brush, the NV500 can deliver intense and deep cleaning to wipe out the stubborn dirt from the carpet. This ergonomic feature remains absent in Shark NV501 providing less intense cleaning for the floors. But it offers multi-angle cleaning which reduces the amount of required passing for the cleaner. Not to mention, you may need to go for several passings for the former NV500 as it lacks this feature.
There come to some attachments for both models to increase the vacuuming performance. With the NV500, you will get straight nozzles, canister caddy, crevice tool, and standard power brush. Meanwhile, the NV501 comes with straight nozzles, canister caddy, and crevice tools along with multi-angle brushing.
Dust Cup Capacity
Premium Power Brushing
Power Cord Length
Standard Power Brush
1. Canister Caddy
2. 12” Flexi Crevice
4. Straight Nozzle
1. Dusting Brush
2. Larger Turbo Brush
3. 12” Crevice Tool
4. Canister Caddy
Reviewing the details of our Shark NV500 vs NV501, there is no clear winner yet both are winners when it comes to performance, reliability, and price. If you want to have an intense and deep cleaning for the floors, you can get the NV500. Apart from that, you can take it to clean if you have a deal with pet hair removal.
In the meantime, you can settle with NV501 for a thorough, convenient and larger space cleaning. With several advanced and upgraded tool attachments, you will experience a satisfactory performance without a doubt.
For having a convenient, flawless and economic option of automated vacuuming, you can ultimately rely on Roomba products. With continuous modifications, there are too many models to choose. Among many others, model 618 and 650 from 600 series still remains as popular and effective choices.
For a cheap and effective choice, you can narrow down the list to Roomba 618 and Roomba 650. But getting the one from these two seems quite difficult as they share several similarities as members of 600 series. Along with our Roomba 618 vs 650 article, we will make the task easy for you by providing details of their features and performance which will help you to make your decision at once.
Though both are kind of old and come with almost the same features, you will definitely need to get an elaborate and distinctive picture of these two ergonomic vacuum cleaner. And they're selling at current market reveals their popularity well enough, though Roomba 650 is way ahead of Roomba 618 in terms of selling and popularity.
Despite being members of much successful Roomba 600 series, Roomba 650 contains some minor upgrades that lack in Roomba 618. Going through our Roomba 618 vs 650 reviews, you will certainly get a clearer difference which will help you to make the ultimate choice with ease.
There are slight differences in terms of design and construction for both models. Roomba 618 design may not hold that much attraction for home decor, whereas Roomba 650 has a quite superior design. Again, the former comes with an oval-shape and the latter provides a perfect circular shape.
Flaunting sleek aesthetics, both of the models have metal alloy body which imparts great durability. Apart from them, their low-profile construction offers easier accessibility, though the former has a little higher height.
For a robotic vacuum cleaner, portability may not seem to be a big issue. But ease of carriage for any product is a good characteristic. And regarding that, these versatile 600 series creations come with 11 and 11.8 pounds of weight. With less difference and convenient weight, you will get satisfactory portability for sure.
All the robots from 600 series come with Lithium-ion battery, although their charging time and power consumption rate can be different. Regarding the charging time and running time, both the models share complete similarities. A full battery recharge requires about 3 hours whereas it will give a run time of 1 hours or so.
Automatic docking of the robotic cleaner is one versatile feature. With both of the models, you can have this useful feature to enjoy continuous recharging and cleaning. Though recharging as well as resuming the vacuum will require manual effort, you can have quite an ease of operating thanks to the self-docking of the robots.
Being an older version with almost outdated technology, both the Roomba models consist of simple ruling sets for effective navigation. In fact, using Roomba Bounce technique for 500 and 600 series, they offer anti-collision, cliff and dirt detection, virtual wall and mapping facilities.
Anti-collision is the main feature of Roomba Bounce at which they set a straight path for cleaning. If they hit an object, they set another new line for moving. This feature is available for both Roomba 618 and Roomba 650.
In case of approaching stairs or high undulations, the sensors will trigger the stopping of the robots. Meanwhile, the virtual wall prevents the entrance of the robot in a specific room portion. This feature is absent in the former one and both the models lack having the mapping feature.
Along with patented 3-stage cleaning, both models share similar cleaning system which involves loosening, picking up and therefore, suctioning to wipe out the dirt. Needless to say, the robots are designed to provide diligent cleanups for the floors.
There are filters to take care of the dirt, debris, and allergens from the floor, regardless of its type. But neither one comes with advanced and more effective HEPA filter which makes the cleaning efficiency objectionable enough.
Both the models are compatible with common floor type like hardwood, carpet, tile and even bare concrete floors. Through a quick encounter to the assigned environment, both cleaners come with optimum cleaning performance thanks to multi-surface cleaning brushes.
Containing intelligent sensors, the models will experience zero collision and drop-off. The sensors also help to pick up the debris in a whole. But Roomba 650 offers better cleaning efficiency with its ability to pick up almost any kind of dirt.
With a 0.4L capacity dirt bin for the models, they hold good enough for small cleaning. Though this much capacity is quite lower comparing with modern and advanced cleaners. You will definitely require multiple cleanups for the bin while cleaning a large room.
Providing multiple brushes like the flexible brush, side brush alongside with the main spinning brush, you will experience further cleaning. These contribute to proper cleaning of edges and sides of the running line resulting in better cleanups.
Patented 3-Stage Cleaning
Patented 3-Stage Cleaning
15.5 x 5.5 x 17.5 in
13.4 x 3.6 x 13.4 in
1. Edge Sweeping Brush
2. Multi-surface Cleaning Brush
3. Some Minor-type Brushes
1. Spinning Side Brush
2. Flexible Brush
3. Bristle Brush
At the end of our Roomba 618 vs 650 reviews, you may have found the models quite similar in terms of system, tools, and performance. At present, numerous advanced cleaners come with more features to meet customer satisfaction.
With a bit advanced modifications for the aforementioned old vacuums, Roomba 650 is more preferable than Roomba 618. In fact, Roomba 650 still remains at the top of the customer choices thanks to its controversial design and suitability. If you want to settle with average cleaning performance available in a lower price tag, you can rely on Roomba 618.
From all the cleaning stuff invented by modern technology, the vacuum cleaner is the most help providing one, however at home or other places. But whenever the fact comes in mind ‘How does it work?’ most of us often get satisfied with the answer, ‘I switch it on and it starts working’. But have you ever thought how does it really work? I mean the inner construction that makes it run, do you know about it?
Well, if you don’t, you should know it in order to get a good one if you are about to buy a new and keep the old one safely stored by knowing it’s working parts and principles very well. However, you probably purchase a vac machine by only thinking about the outer look but to get a good one, selecting the one with good parts is important. And this article will help you to know about the working principle and important parts of a vacuum cleaner to know the A to Z about the device.
Let’s get started.
Before you dive deep to this topic you must get introduced to the parts a vacuum cleaner is made with. After you know the parts well you will not only understand the 50% of its working principle but also it will help you to get clear idea on how to wash and clean them properly. Here are the Vacuum Cleaner parts below.
This part of a vacuum cleaner mainly does the job of starting the device through an electric connection. When you press the ‘on’ button, the vacuum motor gets started by creating the force of sucking the dirt and debris in with the nozzle. Basically, the motor starts with a speedy fan attached to it.
This portion goes over the dirt and debris and pulls them inside the vacuum cleaner with the force of air created by the motor.
Brush rollers are normally attached to the nozzle and help to clean more deeply with the bushes it has. Whenever it’s about cleaning carpets and rugs this stuff works great.
Every Vacuum Cleaner has 2 types of filters that keep an eye on the entrance and existence of the air and makes sure it’s dust free. Basically, the first one allows the dust-free air to go inside and the second one releases air outside the device.
The edge of the device is called the ‘Power Head’. You can bring a variety of cleaning style with this part. Just by changing the brush rollers attached to the power head you can clean in different ways.
This is the cup where all the dust and debris your vac machine pulled inside gets collected into. The size of the cup is not that big and so it needs to get changed when it’s full.
With the hose, you can clean with enough space facility. If you want to clean something really dusty and dirty the hose is going to help you accurate.
A vac machine is made with the cyclone technology that makes the device run and sucks dirt inside until the dust collecting cup is full.
This is a great feature of the device that helps you to see the dirt of the corners and lowlight places.
By pressing the power button you can turn the device on and off as well with a double tap. Most Vacuum machines have a one-button process that works with the double tapping policy, but the digital devices are now having a digital screen of power off and on and control the machine also.
This is the part with what most people choose which one they are going to go with. Along with the working ability checking that the device looks good is also important. The outer cover can be made of any material and it’s up to your choice which one looks appealing to you most.
So, you know with what parts the device work. Now, let’s talk about how the entire process runs.
Just the way we suck juice or shakes with straw, the same way a vacuum machine sucks dirt inside. This is the simplest example to understand the working principle of a vac machine. In fact, however old or digitalized the machine is the working procedure is always the same. And the parts are similar in all devices as well maybe with some extra parts or some less.
Cleaning the floors or carpet is now an essential requirement to maintain a suitable interior. With the enhancement of new techniques and its continuous influence, there are now robotic cleaners available. And iRobot, an industry leading cleaner manufacturer, has introduced numerous versatile robotic cleaners to encourage more efficiency with greater quality.
Among many of their popular models, Roomba 761 and 650 still remain at top choices, despite being older generations. Both of them are blessed with sufficient features to get you the best performance in first hand. But when you are down to these two, which one you will choose is a big question. Therefore, we got here with Roomba 761 vs 650 comparisons to help you get a more detailed, clearer and distinctive picture of these two hard-hitting robots.
iRobot Roomba 761
3 Stage AeroForce
iRobot Roomba 650
3 Stage AeroForce
Regarding Roomba 761 and Roomba 650, each of the models has suitability for fulfilling specific cleaning requirements. Although there are several models featured with advanced cleaning technology are now in the market, these two still remains at the top list of the customers. But to pick the best from these two, you need to understand the similarities and differences between them.
Roomba 761 belongs to iRobot series 700 whereas the model 650 belongs to the series 600. To induce better performance, series 700 is equipped with further state of the art. Right now, we will get you through Roomba 761 vs 650 which will give a detailed comparison to break down these quality products.
Both the models share the same circular construction. Though the size of the 761 is a bit larger than the 650, the larger size holds better technology in this case for 761. The former one contains lees control button that its competitor here.
They have different but attractive appearances to suit your choices. In fact, the 761 has a silver color, whereas, the 650 arrives with a black exterior.
As an automated machine, they require less portability than manual ones. But still, you need something lightweight to carry, hold and take somewhere else. Regarding the weight, Roomba 650 has a lighter frame of 11.7 pounds thanks to its smaller size. Meanwhile, the 761 has a bit heavier frame weighing 14.6 pounds.
Despite having different weight, they won’t give you any major trouble with portability issue. As the weights are close to each other, they do share almost the same ease for carriage and transportation.
The 761 is a 30W unit to produce the cleaning suction whereas the 650 is a 33W unit which introduces a better suctioning. Therefore, the former one requires more energy consumption than its counterparts in this case.
Though cleaning time of 120 minutes is the same for both, they require a different battery and charging time. In fact, the latter one with Li-ion battery needs 4 – 5 hours for a full charging. And the 761 with Ni-MH battery comes with faster charging requiring 3 hours.
Both of the models share same Aero Force 3-stage technology to clean the debris. This particular technique involves auto, spot and edge cleaning facility which will result in a better cleaning performance for carpet as well as hard floors.
To induce a convenient operational facility for the user, the models have different attachments. There is Wi-Fi connectivity for 650 models through which the user can control the machine using the iRobot App. But this feature is not available for the advanced and comparatively new model of 761.
Apart from that, the 650 has an external display which gone missing for model 761. Though the display doesn’t play a significant role in cleaning, yet it is something that many expect for better control.
But to recover the absent features, there comes remote control facility for Roomba 761. It is absent in 650 and this is why the former model contains fewer control buttons at the exterior surface.
The models have the similar system to clean the dirt from the collector dustbin. All you have to do is open the hatch and take off the debris and dirt from the inside. Not to mention, there is no voice control system for any of these two like the advanced series.
The very first thing is the dirt holding capacity and you will get a slight difference for the models. The 761 has 0.5 L capacity thanks to its larger construction. But the other one is no less with a capacity of 0.47 L.
The latter one provides a bit more suction than its counterpart with further power consumption. This is why 650 holds good for short animal hair or grubby debris. But it can get stuck easily with longer hair and confined spaces.
Through adaptive navigation, the 761 provides a better result in this case. Again, the noise level is surprisingly quieter for 761 than 650. But model 761 may require more passing to clean than model 650.
Both the cleaners are programmed to return the bases over the completion of scheduled tasks or low battery. But scheduling remains a bit easier with 650 with the blessing of the included display.
For an occasional cleaning to handle small-scale debris or pet hair, you can set for Roomba 650. And if you don’t mind with its navigational drawbacks, this would be the best. Meanwhile, to handle a bit larger mess without any manual interpretation, it is better to get Roomba 761.
From our Roomba 761 vs 650 reviews, it may seem that there are greater differences between the aforementioned models. But, the inclusion of individual and identical features makes it difficult to choose the right one. But whichever you will choose, you will receive a satisfactory cleaning at the end of the day.